05/10/2006

New EU regulation on Advanced Therapies

A Draft Report on the proposal for a regulation on advanced therapy medicinal products was rejected by the European Parliament Environment, public health and food safety (ENVI) committee, which met 13 September 2006.

The proposal concerned human tissue engineering, gene and cell-based therapies. Hitherto, tissue engineering has lain outside the regulatory framework, resulting in divergent national standards that have
negatively affected efforts to innovate and compete in this potentially lucrative market.

The main points of the proposal were
  • a requirement for a centralised marketing authorisation procedure
  • the creation of a new, multidisciplinary expert Committee for Advanced Therapies, within the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), to provide scientific advice
  • technical requirements to ensure quality, safety and efficacy
  • risk management and traceability requirements
  • special incentives for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
The proposed Regulation would have left to individual Member States the decision to use or prohibit particular types of cells (such as embryonic stem cells) on ethical grounds. Industry is now recognizing that application of the “subsidiary” principle in this way will allow some EU countries to prevent the sale, use or supply of these products thereby fragmenting the single market and casting doubt over the integrity of single European marketing authorization.

Pro-progress MEPs rejected the proposed regulation because amendments that were adopted during the debate would have restricted its scope of application. The ENVI committee proposed in its amendment 15, creating an article 1bis, to exclude from latter “any advanced therapy medicinal product which is prepared in full in a hospital on a one-off basis according to a specific, non-standardised and non-patented process, and used in a hospital, in order to comply with an individual medical prescription for an individual patient”.

This and ethical considerations seem to be the reason why the draft regulation was rejected by the Committee.

It is extremely rare for a report to be rejected by a Committee. The Rapporteur (who chaired the drafting of the report) or the person who will replace him, if he resigns from this function, will have to present an entirely new report.

Share |

eZ debug

Clear cache:

Quick settings:

Notice: eZMySQLDB::query(0.000 ms) query number per page:0 May 23 2012 10:49:41
SET NAMES 'utf8'
Timing: May 23 2012 10:49:41
Module start 'content'
Timing: May 23 2012 10:49:41
Module end 'content'
Timing: May 23 2012 10:49:41
End

Timing points:

CheckpointElapsedRel. ElapsedMemoryRel. Memory
Module start 'content'0.0000 sec0.0495 sec4,348.2617KB2,197.2656KB
Module end 'content'0.0495 sec0.7223 sec6,545.5273KB4,944.0469KB
End0.7718 sec 11,489.5742KB0.0000KB
Total runtime:0.7826 sec

Time accumulators:

 Accumulator Elapsed Percent Count Average
ini_load
Load cache0.0120 sec1.4179%120.0010 sec
FindInputFiles0.0090 sec1.0717%120.0008 sec
Mysql Total
Mysql_queries0.2031 sec24.0970%1570.0013 sec
Looping result0.0156 sec1.8460%1550.0001 sec
Template Total0.7300 sec 86.6% 2 0.3650 sec
Template load0.0122 sec1.4484%20.0061 sec
Template processing0.7177 sec85.1279%20.3588 sec
override
Cache load0.0042 sec0.5032%20.0021 sec
General
String conversion0.0000 sec0.0010%10.0000 sec
dbfile0.0781 sec9.2666%50.0156 sec
Total script time:0.8430 sec

Templates used to render the page:

Usage countRequested templateTemplateTemplate loadedEditOverride
1pagelayout.tpl<No override>design/eahp2/templates/pagelayout.tplEdit templateOverride template
1setup/debug_toolbar.tpl<No override>design/sydesy/templates/setup/debug_toolbar.tplEdit templateOverride template
      
 Number of times templates used: 2
 Number of unique templates used: 2
 Time used to render template usage: 0.0001 secs