An interprofessional team for the management of nausea and vomiting in a haematological oncology unit

European Statement: 

  • Clinical Pharmacy Services

Author(s): 

Mapi Fleury
Januska De Maria-Lee
Alessandra Taiana
Yvan Bourgeois
Sophie Voruz
Olivier Spertini
Pierre-Yves Bochud

What was done?: 

Patient nausea and vomiting (NV)—particularly chemotherapy-induced NV (CINV) in malignant haemopathies—was managed by an interprofessional team.

Why was it done?: 

In 2019, procedural changes within unit treating malignant haemopathies raised awareness about unsatisfactory management of NV, particularly CINV. We identified a lack of departmental consensus, leading to heterogeneous therapeutic practices, confusion over the aetiologies of NV and feelings of powerlessness among healthcare professionals. We decided to improve the whole process, from prophylaxis to treatment, by addressing specific knowledge gaps concerning CINV, improving pathophysiological and pharmacological knowledge, and implementing interprofessional management and MASCC/ESMO guidelines.

How was it done?: 

A multidisciplinary working group was established to create a comprehensive, patient-centred NV management programme. Work sessions focussed on attaining a therapeutic consensus and adapting international guidelines to our context. Different professions learnt about each other’s needs and fields of competency, enabling each to be heard and creating mutual benefits through sharing expertise and knowledge. Pathophysiological/pharmacological leadership was given to clinical pharmacist, including developing and teaching specific protocols and supervising complex clinical situations in the field.

What has been achieved?: 

Interprofessional consensus was reached, documentation and techniques were implemented including clinical evaluation checklists at patient admission. CINV therapeutic regimens were completely updated and immediately and automatically included in cancer treatment protocols. The clinical pharmacist and specialist nurses give initial interprofessional training to new colleagues and ensure continuous on-site supervision. This transversal work has resulted in fewer patients suffering from NV and better team understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms, differential diagnoses and adverse drug effects—this also ended the use of unsuitable medications and dosages. Overcoming this critical situation also allowed us to begin non-pharmacological integrative care.

What next?: 

Interprofessional working group proved indispensable to this approach. Including CINV pharmacotherapy directly into cancer treatment plans is one of programme’s strong points and contributes to high adherence to guidelines. Team feels more relaxed and more in control. Monitoring is now done by tracking files and oral feedback, but we aim to implement systematic follow-up of interventions, care evaluations and NV to assess programme’s impact. Next stage will also include patient feedback.

Keywords: 

  • Clinical pharmacyMultidisciplinary team
  • Clinical pharmacyPharmaceutical care
  • Theraputic areasOncology

Conflict of interest: 

I have no potential conflict of interest to disclose